ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Topics
    2. Tags
    3. disaster recovery
    Log in to post
    • All categories
    • M

      Crashplan vs Backblaze in 2018

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion backblaze backup disaster recovery crashplan
      27
      2 Votes
      27 Posts
      3k Views
      dafyreD

      @JaredBusch said in Crashplan vs Backblaze in 2018:

      @dafyre said in Crashplan vs Backblaze in 2018:

      @JaredBusch said in Crashplan vs Backblaze in 2018:

      @dafyre said in Crashplan vs Backblaze in 2018:

      @Donahue said in Crashplan vs Backblaze in 2018:

      @JaredBusch said in Crashplan vs Backblaze in 2018:

      @dafyre said in Crashplan vs Backblaze in 2018:

      @black3dynamite said in Crashplan vs Backblaze in 2018:

      @dafyre said in Crashplan vs Backblaze in 2018:

      @black3dynamite said in Crashplan vs Backblaze in 2018:

      @Markferron said in Crashplan vs Backblaze in 2018:

      @DustinB3403 said in Crashplan vs Backblaze in 2018:

      Can I ask why you are protecting user devices though? Generally these have very little on them and through simple policy can everything be saved on your servers or cloud and thus don't need backup.

      I would really like to do this. We have onedrive available for all of our users and I was thinking of coming up with some sort of system that just uses their onedrive as the primary source of their homefolder.

      That's how I do it but we are using Nextcloud.

      All users root folders under their user profile is linked to the actual folders in C:\Users\john.doe\Nextcloud{Desktop, Documents, etc...}. And the data is synced back to the Nextcloud server and that server is backed up.

      How do you go about doing that? Editing the location of Desktop, Documents, etc... ?

      Use Junction Points. Its like using symbolic links in Linux.

      Oh... Duh, lol. Thanks.

      I'm just trying to figure out how that would work if you have to do more than a few client machines at a time.

      Something like this. It is not ready for prime time, but was my starting point last week when setting up a new desktop.

      $User = Read-Host "Enter UserName" Remove-Item -Path "C:\Users\$User\Desktop" New-Item -ItemType Junction -Path "C:\Users\$User" -Name "Desktop" -Target "C:\Users\$User\Nextcloud\Desktop" -Force Remove-Item -Path "C:\Users\$User\Documents" New-Item -ItemType Junction -Path "C:\Users\$User" -Name "Documents" -Target "C:\Users\$User\Nextcloud\Documents" -Force Remove-Item -Path "C:\Users\$User\Downloads" New-Item -ItemType Junction -Path "C:\Users\$User" -Name "Downloads" -Target "C:\Users\$User\Nextcloud\Downloads" -Force Remove-Item -Path "C:\Users\$User\Favorites" New-Item -ItemType Junction -Path "C:\Users\$User" -Name "Favorites" -Target "C:\Users\$User\Nextcloud\Favorites" -Force Remove-Item -Path "C:\Users\$User\Music" New-Item -ItemType Junction -Path "C:\Users\$User" -Name "Music" -Target "C:\Users\$User\Nextcloud\Music" -Force Remove-Item -Path "C:\Users\$User\Pictures" New-Item -ItemType Junction -Path "C:\Users\$User" -Name "Pictures" -Target "C:\Users\$User\Nextcloud\Pictures" -Force Remove-Item -Path "C:\Users\$User\Videos" New-Item -ItemType Junction -Path "C:\Users\$User" -Name "Videos" -Target "C:\Users\$User\Nextcloud\Videos" -Force

      where would this be run from, the DC?

      This would have to be run from the End-user's computer from the looks of it.

      You are trying to screw with the end user's folders. they have to exist, and you have to have rights to them. neither of which are true of an admin account.

      Are you automating this -- then How?

      If you're not automating it, then why not just manually add the folders to the NextCloud client?

      /sigh FFS...

      @JaredBusch said in Crashplan vs Backblaze in 2018:

      Something like this. It is not ready for prime time, but was my starting point last week when setting up a new desktop.

      lol. I thought you were talking about the code...

      Time to research a way to do that.

    • DustinB3403D

      Hyper-V Node Failover Cluster Control

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion hyper-v migration virtual machines disaster recovery
      8
      0 Votes
      8 Posts
      958 Views
      JaredBuschJ

      @Obsolesce said in Hyper-V Node Failover Cluster Control:

      @JaredBusch said in Hyper-V Node Failover Cluster Control:

      @Obsolesce said in Hyper-V Node Failover Cluster Control:

      @DustinB3403 said in Hyper-V Node Failover Cluster Control:

      How can I migrate my VM's from Host 1 to Host 2 and ensure that the VMs don't attempt to automatically migrate back to their preferred host?

      Migration? It's definitely not automatic in the least.

      Planned failover? There's a checkbox to uncheck if you don't want automatic reverse replication and the VM to automatically start up. Could that be what you meant?

      Of course it is. In an actual cluster. Which involves System Center Configuraiton Manager (SCCM).

      @DustinB3403 used the word cluster, but he does not have one.

      Oh shit, I missed that it was about a cluster. I was thinking Hyper-V Manager, right-click, live migration. Totally spaced there.

      Yeah, that was my point, it is not a cluster.

    • Emad RE

      B2 Backup checkup

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion rclone backblaze backblaze b2 disaster recovery backups cloud storage
      3
      1 Votes
      3 Posts
      732 Views
      JaredBuschJ

      @scottalanmiller said in B2 Backup checkup:

      @Emad-R said in B2 Backup checkup:

      Then if you do this how you do you check that the Backups are good or you just the tar archive.

      You'd untar them.

      That is a full check. But without paying to download the file you just uploaded, you hash the file first and send the hash along with the upload. B2 will hash it when completed and verify that it matches your supplied hash. If it doesn’t, it asks it to reupload.

    • DonahueD

      Adding tape drive

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion backup tape lto 7 lto sas sata disaster recovery
      44
      1 Votes
      44 Posts
      5k Views
      scottalanmillerS

      @Donahue said in Adding tape drive:

      at this point, I would have to get management buy in to really consider cloud, I want to evaluate the options before hand to know how much I should or shouldn't be pushing for the cloud. Recent conversations with @scottalanmiller have me questioning our historical reasons and motivations for why we use what we use. In my case, we have a mix of prior misinformed speculation and my limited personal experience.

      I don't see a reason to emulate tape if I'm not going to use tape, but I really don't know

      Well if you use tape, then no reason to emulate.

    • J

      Sangoma Linux and mondo archive

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion freepbx linux centos centos 7 sangoma linux 7 disaster recovery backup
      40
      2 Votes
      40 Posts
      3k Views
      scottalanmillerS

      @jnaugle also worth noting, no one actually delivers PRI today, that entire market is a scam. It's actually SIP and then they translate the SIP to PRI on your network edge to make it "sound cool" for people who are out of date and remember when PRI was both still available and actually practical (early 1990s and earlier.) PRI is not nearly as powerful as SIP, nor as cheap, so phone providers long ago "all" moved to providing SIP instead (PRI isn't possible without a physical T1) and "virtualizing" PRI on top of it. All the PRI does it increase cost and lower performance, flexibility and reliability.

      So the best solution is to get the phone provider to stop pretending to do PRI and just give you the raw SIP. This improves your phone quality by removing unnecessary steps and limitations, removes the need for you to convert back to SIP (gateway, card, however you do it) and makes everything better for everyone. The PRI interface has no advantages, only disadvantages. It takes the better SIP, and cripples it.

      For people running ancient phone systems from before VoIP, SIP isn't possible, so these terrible PRI interfaces are useful for them to continue to be able to hook up those ancient phone systems while still being able to connect to current phone companies. They aren't totally useless, but they are useful only for that one terrible niche case.

    • scottalanmillerS

      Agent and Agentless Backups

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion backups disaster recovery agentless
      80
      1 Votes
      80 Posts
      9k Views
      stacksofplatesS

      @obsolesce said in Agent and Agentless Backups:

      @stacksofplates said in Agent and Agentless Backups:

      @obsolesce said in Agent and Agentless Backups:

      @stacksofplates said in Agent and Agentless Backups:

      As much as I like to argue with @scottalanmiller I have to agree that usually agents are easier.

      Because the agent based backup meant that to recover the entire guest, I would have to mount a special ISO, it wasn't nearly as straightforward as "restore this backup from 15 minutes ago to Host 2".

      That is in no way a requirement of agent based systems. This sounds more like there isn't a reliable way to reproduce a system and the data isn't on a separate volume. Make sure the systems can be rebuilt immediately and you can just reattach the data and be done.

      Even with something as simple as ReaR, you define your skeleton volumes you want backed up and include that in your template.

      Example (I'll use Ansible since that's what I know):

      The template would have this in it:

      BACKUP_PROG_INCLUDE=('{{ backup_dirs | join("' '") }}')

      You'd have a list (in this case called backup_dirs) that gets iterated over:

      backup_dirs: - /home/* - /data/* - /var/www/html/*

      That backup_dirs list is specific to each machine when it's created.

      The agent based stuff is really simple because it can very easily be specific for each machine and always be specific when the systems are built without any work after the initial set up.

      Just because a system is backed up via agentless backup doesn't mean the VMs data can't be separate. I could have a VM backed up agentlessly that has its data on a separate volume / virtual disk... then I could instantly restore the VM and OS, reattach the data, and not have to rebuild shit.

      That's not why I said that. If you have to fully restore a system from an ISO the agent built, then it doesn't sound like the data was separate.

      No I meant you would boot to a recovery/boot ISO so you can restore the server from within the recovery encironment

      You're missing what I'm saying. If the data volume is separate you just attach it to a fresh VM and don't have to do that at all. The only time you need to rebuild from that recovery environment is when either the data isn't separate or you can't reliably reproduce the OS volume.

    • OksanaO

      Forget about disasters sabotaging your IT environment with stretched clustering

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Starwind starwind starwind vsan starwind virtual san ha high availability disaster recovery hyperconverged stretched clusters failover cluster failover-clustering high performance
      1
      3 Votes
      1 Posts
      730 Views
      No one has replied
    • OksanaO

      Replacing physical tapes with object and cloud storage is a piece of cake

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News starwind vtl starwind veeamon tape library virtual tape library virtual tapes disaster recovery cloud storage
      1
      2 Votes
      1 Posts
      858 Views
      No one has replied
    • OksanaO

      A closer look at conventional DR site options for Windows Server 2016

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Starwind windows server 2016 windows server ws2016 disaster recovery replication veeam hyper-v
      1
      1 Votes
      1 Posts
      655 Views
      No one has replied
    • scottalanmillerS

      Backup Windows with UrBackup

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion urbackup urbackup-client backups disaster recovery chocolatey
      33
      6 Votes
      33 Posts
      4k Views
      scottalanmillerS

      @obsolesce said in Backup Windows with UrBackup:

      I like the way MBS (as how Microsoft defines as "Modern Backup Solutions") work. Most do CBT very well, like Veeam, SC-DPM, and other modern solutions.

      I literally refer to these as legacy backups, lol.

    • OksanaO

      Meet the next generation of StarWind HyperConverged Appliances

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Starwind starwind highavailability disaster recovery hyperconverged
      1
      1 Votes
      1 Posts
      536 Views
      No one has replied
    • OksanaO

      Putting conventional DR site options for Windows Server 2016 on the table

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Starwind windows server 2016 hyper-v microsoft replication storage veeam disaster recovery
      1
      1 Votes
      1 Posts
      568 Views
      No one has replied
    • scaleS

      How do I backup my VMs on Scale HC3?

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Scale Legion backup scale scale hc3 disaster recovery
      1
      4 Votes
      1 Posts
      1k Views
      No one has replied
    • scaleS

      Scale HC3 Resources - MS SQL Server Backup Options

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Scale Legion scale scale hc3 sql server disaster recovery backup recovery
      1
      2 Votes
      1 Posts
      672 Views
      No one has replied
    • scaleS

      Veeam - Full VM Restore into HC3 - Windows and Linux Recovery

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Scale Legion veeam scale scale hc3 disaster recovery windows linux backup recovery how to
      2
      4 Votes
      2 Posts
      2k Views
      scaleS

      Veeam also has a Linux based recovery environment that can provide full recovery of Linux VM's into the HC3 system.

      Unlike windows, the virtio drivers are already built in to the Veeam Linux Recovery ISO so there is no additional step required for it to see the disk to recover to ... so in this example, I just want to restore all of disk vda from the backup repostory to the blank vda disk.

      34iyt1hfakvn.png

      Restore the entire disk.

      b3yuhb1yaumf.png

      17w2jukfkncw.png

    • OksanaO

      Don’t choose between private or public cloud – get both in StarWind Hybrid Cloud

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Starwind hybrid cloud starwind hybrid cloud disaster recovery webinar public cloud private cloud starwind
      1
      1 Votes
      1 Posts
      827 Views
      No one has replied
    • OksanaO

      Comparing MS SQL Server Basic Availability Groups and Failover Cluster Instances features

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Starwind sql server 2016 disaster recovery failover cluster instances fci bags basic availability groups databases mission-critical database software-defined storage high availability starwind blog
      1
      3 Votes
      1 Posts
      971 Views
      No one has replied
    • OksanaO

      Choose wisely: SQL Server Failover Cluster Instances vs. Basic Availability Groups

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Starwind sql server 2016 sql server failover cluster instances fci basic availability groups bags starwind mission-critical database database high availability disaster recovery ha dr
      2
      3 Votes
      2 Posts
      2k Views
      dbeatoD

      @oksana Still backups are needed 🙂

    • scaleS

      HC3 Cloud Unity with Google Cloud Platform

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Scale Legion scale scale hc3 scale hc3 cloud unity google google cloud platform hyperconvergence hyperconverged disaster recovery cloud computing virtualization nested virtualization scale blog
      4
      4 Votes
      4 Posts
      2k Views
      scaleS

      SDX Central wrote about the deal as well: https://www.sdxcentral.com/articles/news/google-scale-unite-hci-google-cloud-platform/2017/09/

      Scott Lowe at VMware even blogged about it: https://blogs.vmware.com/feed-items/scale-computing-hc3-cloud-unity-seeks-to-tear-down-infrastructure-and-application-walls/

      Outside of tech, the deal is being talked about by the likes of Business Inside and Forbes:

      http://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/Scale-Computing-Collaborates-with-Google-Cloud-to-Remove-Barriers-to-Cloud-Computing-with-Hybrid-Cloud-MobilityHC3-Cloud-Unity-combines-Scale-HC3-and-Google-Cloud-Platform-on-the-same-LAN-allowing-1002732170

      https://www.forbes.com/sites/justinwarren/2017/09/28/scale-computing-gets-cloudy-with-google/

    • OksanaO

      SQL Server “Just Never Fails!” © with AlwaysOn Failover Cluster Instances (FCI)

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Starwind sql server alwayson fci sql server alwayson failover cluster instances fci disaster recovery high availability sql server alwayson failover cluster cluster zero downtime starwind blog
      1
      2 Votes
      1 Posts
      2k Views
      No one has replied
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    • 3 / 5